Politics

SALL: Tsatsu Tsikata exposes alleged forgery and unconstitutionality CI.128

Ghface.com

President of IMANI Ghana, Franklin Cudjoe has called out Lawyer Tsatsu Tsikata for exposing alleged forgery and unconstitutionality of Constitutional Instrument (CI) 128.

According to the socio-political commentator, there was drama at the Supreme court as lead counsel of the plaintiffs in the case of Peter Amewu and SALL rose to his feet to uncover the purported forgery of CI) 128.

Read below what Franklin Cudjoe posted on his Facebook timeline on Tsatsu Tsikata;

“allegedly place SALL in Buem Constituency when laid in Parliament on 8th July 2020” and “By law, it [the CI] must be gazetted same day and printed by the Assembly Press of Ghana to give validity to it.”

He continued that the “Proof the last page of any documents coming from the Assembly Press has figures or numbers showing exact date of printing and gazetting.”

“However, this document [CI 128] was printed in August 2020 and not July 2020”, this is said is “A clear case of forgery that once more puts the integrity and credibility of EC in the public domain.” – He emphasized

“In clear text, CI 128 is void and unconstitutional, we are waiting to see what conclusions the SC Justices will draw tomorrow” – he concluded.

The Anthony General has filed an application at the Supreme Court seeking to quash the injunction granted the plaintiffs by the Ho High Court preventing the Energy Minister, Peter Amewu from being sworn into office until the final determination of the human rights case before it.

The people of SALL (the people of Santrokofi, Akpafu, Likpe, and Lolobi) said in the last general election, they were excluded from voting in the parliamentary election as they were carved out of Hohoe Constituency but yet placed under any constituency.

Drama in court as Tsatsu exposes forgery and *unconstitutionality of CI 128.* This CI allegedly place SALL in Buem…

Posted by Franklin Cudjoe on Monday, 4 January 2021